Monday 23 February 2009

Representations of Asians in the media

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/aug/25/television.channel4

This article is based upon the dispute between Shilpa Shetty and Jade Goody on the reality TV programme Big Brother telecased on Channel 4. It also talks about how channel 4 was heavily affected by the racism on the big brother show therefore causing a vast decline in the profits made.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/feb/01/paul-stephenson-police-race-relations

This article is regarding the race relations in the metropolitan police and it also mentions in detail how the new commisioner of the police force will try and dissuade the black and the asian minority in the police from joining the metropolitan police force.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jan/19/prince-harry-racism-newspapers

The representations of Asians in this article are negative but sympathic, with the prince harry racism incident involving him and one of his 'friends' in the army after he had called him a 'paki' which was looked upon in outrage.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/28/india-bollywood-slumdog-millionaire

This article is a critics point of view on the film "Slumdog Millionaire" film. He doesn't mind "rags to riches" story lines and doesn't have anything against them, but he basically states and argues that there are two extreme representations of India, either showing the "display of new wealth" or "voyeuristic dire poverty".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/feb/08/bafta-awards-2009-winners

This article talks about the success of the Oscar nominated "Slumdog Millionaire". The article talks about how the film presents such serious issues and it still manages to grab the audiences attention to detail.

Monday 9 February 2009

Slumdog Millionaire

Slumdog Millionaire

“The Feel – Good Film of the Decade”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/24/oscars-india-slumdog-millionaire-ian-jack

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/jan/18/slumdog-millionaire-british-asian-reaction

Slumdog Millionaire shows two different sides to India. Danny Boyle has tried to portray India’s progress as a country by showing the development of the city Mumbai within the film. The development is really clear as at the start of the film there were only scenes from the slums which signify poverty. This is the reality as the growing Indian economy suggests that the country is progressing.

In the film the characters are represented as normal working class Indians. The film puts forward motivational values as an ordinary teenager from the slums wins a large sum of money. The main character ‘Jamal’ a working class teenager challenges the stereotype of ‘The Other’.

The first representation which is noticed by the audience is that the country is corrupt, because of what the characters do in the film. There is a gang of ‘villains’ that do bad things to the small innocent children, for instance a scene is shown where the main villain makes a young boy unconscious and puts hot wax in his eyes to make him blind, and makes him beg for money which goes to him. Boyle depicts Indian people here as cruel and untrustworthy.

Friday 6 February 2009

Essay first Draft

“People might not know what we say here tonight but god they will remember what we do” [[1]]
Texas chainsaw massacre- The Beginning a film directed by Jonathan Liebsmen is a prequel to the remake of the 1974 film The Texas Chain Saw Massacre. “The female body is displayed for the male gaze in order to provide erotic pleasure and ultimately a sense of control over her” [[2]].This suggests that we live in a patriarchal society where men are in power and women are in passive roles and that even though time has changed so much, society is still the same as Laura Mulvey’s theory (1975) of the ‘male gaze’ is still relevant in some cases. Similarly in the slasher genre women are there for the male gaze however this has changed over time, according to the theory of the ‘final girl’ by Carol Clover “there is always a female character who is usually smarter, more conscientious, and more morally pure than her cohorts, who are usually stupid, sloppy, horny teens” [[3]] who tend to be the objects of the ‘male gaze’. Even though “women typically do not drive the narrative forward or act as protagonist” [[4]] they still are the final character to survive giving them some importance in the film rather than just using them purely for their physical attraction.

The women have become more powerful and they are shown to be equally as dominant as men usually are. Hence this shows that women are just as strong as men. In a traditional slasher film the man is shown to be more masculine and comes across with no fear. Whereas now the stereotypes have some what subverted as women are shown to be fighting against the evil rather than being shown helpless, an example of a film which shows that is Creep (2004) as the female protagonist is compelling towards the monster on the other hand the male is shown to be quiet which indicates the role reversal. On the other hand most films from the slasher genre still show how women have been ‘symbolically annihilated’ [[5]] as they always tend to be the victims and the ‘killer’ is always a male this is indeed the case in Texas Chainsaw Massacre.

Texas Chainsaw Massacre- The Beginning being a contemporary film portrays women as dominant, for example we see Diora Baird towards the beginning of the film approaching Taylor Handley in a sexual manner as he is tied up to the bed which shows that the female is in control rather than the stereotypical male. “Most men enjoy this kind of stuff” [[6]] this shows that the roles of women have developed as they are portrayed as being more bold and upfront hence this signifies the changes within the society compared to the 1970’s when the slasher genre was first established. However women have always been used to attract the male audience.

In the film Psycho (1960) by Alfred Hitchcock the shower scene where Janet Leigh is having a shower is also an attempt by the male director to attract the male gaze although the scenes shown from that era are not as explicit as they are today. The shower scene starts with a close up shot of a woman in the shower which only captures her face hence it is not explicit content although it could be perceived as the male gaze as the woman in the shower is supposedly naked. Most shots are close ups and extreme close ups as this is a technique used to hide the lower body of Janet Leigh and also the combination of the close shots with the short duration between cuts makes the sequence feel longer, more subjective, more uncontrolled, and more violent than would the images if they were presented alone or in a wider angle.

‘Representation is seen as an expression of ideology, it expresses different kinds of power relationships in society which are to do with inequalities of groups’ [[7]]. Jordana Brewster challenges these dominant ideologies in Texas Chainsaw Massacre. She is portrayed as an ambitious and powerful character which challenges the stereotypes that females are associated with such as weak, emotional, and sex objects. She is a powerful character as she is shown as being brave and using weapons like gun, knife etc. The weapons represent the male side of her character and it can also be seen as phallic objects hence this reinforces her power as she can oppose the male without any fear. The weapons also show gender equality as it symbolises ‘women as representation signify castration’. [[8]]
Texas Chainsaw Massacre- The Beginning clearly suggests that the representation of women in the slasher genre has changed as women are shown to be more strong and independent. Texas Chainsaw Massacre – The Beginning proves the theory of Carol Clover incorrect as she states that the final girl fights the villain and survives. In this film the final character to survive is a female but she is killed by the psychopath at the end. Although films in the slasher genre on the whole have proven the theory of Carol Clover over many years. Films such as Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) and Halloween (1978) have proven the theory correct. Clover also argues that the final female becomes more masculine through "phallic appropriation" by taking up a weapon, such as a knife or chainsaw, against the killer. This argument of Clover is shown in the film as Jordana Brewster, who is the final female to survive confronts the villain with a knife in order to escape. On the other hand Laura Mulvey argues that ‘the audience are forced to see the film from a male point of view, whatever gender is watching’ [[9]]. This argument is partly true, as in TCM- The Beginning Jordana Brewster’s friend in the movie Diora Baird, who happens to be a female, is murdered. Mulvey’s Male Gaze view can be contradicted as in a later scene in the film; Jordana Brewster’s boyfriend is killed. Laura Mulvey also argues that ‘male spectators enjoy the sexual pleasure in the way some women are presented’ [[10]]. This could be interpreted as a valid point as society has become more acceptant of explicit content on screen over the years and the film directors also target the male audience through showing women in seductive roles. On the other hand an oppositional view to Mulvey’s point wo.uld be that the changing roles in society suggest that female spectators enjoy sexual pleasure in the way men are presented, an example would be the scene from TCM – The Beginning where Taylor Handley is tied up to the bed semi naked which is attracting the female audience hence the roles have changed.

Patrick Phillip states that ‘the audience demand for predictability’ [[11]] this suggests that the audience want to see the typical stereotypes being reinforced rather than subverted as in a way from this the audience gains satisfaction hence even though women in slasher films are being represented as being more active there are still stereotypes which are reinforced such as women being represented as promiscuous characters for the entertainment of the male audience. On the other hand some theorists argue that “the genre is not fixed” [[12]]. Steve Neale suggests that “if each text within a genre were, literally, the same, there would simply not be enough difference to generate either meaning or pleasure” [[13]]. This quotation suggests that there needs to be some sort of a difference between one film and another for it to appeal to the target audience hence the key to producing a successful film is to cover both aspects for the audience pleasure. For example TCM- The Beginning follows this strategy as we see the representation of women being reconstructed as they are shown to be more active in their roles whereas the psychopath killer is still the powerful male and he is in control. ‘A tale that purports to uncover the traumas that spawned a family of carnivores but is really just an excuse for blood-soaked business as usual, sending a quartet of shrilling teens through the obligatory old dark house’[[14]]. This is a quotation for TCM – The Beginning which proves that all films within a genre have similarities as they have to follow the conventions.

According to Sharon Journal "the role of women in a film almost always revolves around her physical attraction and the mating games she plays with the male character” [[15]]. This quotation also relates to the theory of Mulvey as it states that women are used in the cinema just for male visual pleasure rather than the female having any active link to the storyline. Although this perception has drastically changed over the years in the media due to feminism and women have been given more challenging roles like men. The roles of men are getting limited as women are becoming more authoritative in their approach “We’ll do as you please” [[16]] this is a dialogue from TCM – The Beginning where Matthew Bomer is speaking to his girl friend Jordana Brewster. This dialogue signifies that the woman is in control. Looking at the character of Andrew Bryniarski it can be said that even though he is portrayed as the central psychopath killer he is shown as a passive character which can be interpreted through the way he is instructed what to do by R. Lee Ermey almost making it seem like he is not intelligent enough to take his own decision. This role reversal of males is accepted by the audience in today’s society due to people having feminist views.

At the beginning of the film Texas Chainsaw Massacre we see the birth of the psychopath which is a technique used to create a sense of realism as it tells the audience how the psychopath started out. This is a very important element as it makes the audience believe in the narrative more and get involved. The flash back taken back to the 1960’s to show the birth of the psychopath tells the audience that he is the central character as the serial killer. The 1996 hit film Scream is the prime example of realism being used in the films as in this film the settings used are realistic along with the narrative for example school, classrooms etc. Settings such as school, classrooms and college environment is used because the killer is tormenting a group of youngsters as this is one of the conventions of horror/ slasher films. The audience can relate to the situation as the primary target market for the horror genre is youngsters. TCM – The Beginning can be accused of not fulfiling the audiences expectation as the story is “Truly lacking in originality” [[17]] and most of the scenes are shot in day light which does not give the film that horror feel as slasher is a sub genre of horror.

Looking at the representation of women between the different ages a clear comparison between the original 1974 Texas Chainsaw Massacre and the contemporary TCM – The Beginning can be made based upon the spirit of age. There are noticeable differences between the two films of the same genre which shows that the representations of women have developed. One of the most common differences that can be seen is that back in the 1970’s women were portrayed as being weak and helpless whereas in the 21st century women are more stronger and are shown putting up a fight against the villain. This change in the representation of women has not only been in the horror/ slasher genre it has taken place in all genres of films. For example looking at Casino Royal from a totally different genre the roles of women have gone way beyond than just being there for the satisfaction of the male audience. For example the scene where Ursula walks seductively out of the water this catches the male gaze whereas to signify that the roles of women have changed is shown carrying a knife.

Opposing Mulveys theory, Clover argues that every slasher film, there is a “Final Girl” character who is the only one, or one of the rare characters to be living, and in most cases it is she who kills the killer, and saves herself without the help of any authoritative figures, for example the police. “The final girl is typically sexually unavailable or virginal, avoiding the vices of the victims” [18] therefore, the theory suggests that she in completely independent and does not follow what the other characters do in the film. Although the character is seen to be attractive, she does not conform to being sexual under any sort of circumstances. Clover also suggests the audience identify with the killer, but then starts to identify with the “Final Girl” partway during the film [19] . Clover argues that the “Final Girl” becomes “masculinized through phallic appropriation, (taking up a weapon), such as a knife or chainsaw, against the killer” [20]. Also Clover suggests that the villian of a slasher film is usually male, whose masculinity or sexuallity is in a crisis. An example of this would be the character of “Norman Bates”, in Alfred Hitchcocks famously low budgeted movie “Psycho”.

Similarly, “Texas Chainsaw massacre” is one of the many key texts in the slasher genre as it follows the typical convention that all slasher genre films are ‘the immensely generative story of a psychokiller who slashes to death a string of mostly female victims, one by one, until he is subdued or killed, usually by one girl who has survived.’ [21] this is the case in most slasher genre films. Texas Chainsaw Massacre The Beginning follows these conventions as it includes a female protagonist whom we follow throughout the movie and we share the experiences that she faces when seeing her fellow colleagues dead. The killer in “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” however did not only kill women. At the beginning he killed the males who were the female characters boyfriend. However, later we see that the killer does kill the homeless male’s girlfriends. Also the fact that he went for Diora Baird and Jordana Brewster suggests that he was capable of killing them too and would have. The fact that we associate the killer instantly to be a male figure, suggests that the film is showing female strength to be stronger than that of a male’s. The audience relates to the movie and feel sadistic pleasures towards the things happening to the other characters. This builds up suspense in the audience as we are all aware that something is bound to happen, yet we are kept thinking when it will happen. The character of Jordana Brewster, the female protagonist in “Texas Chainsaw massacre”, uses a dagger which she stabs the killer with. It is said that because the “Final Girl” appears to be virginal, and chaste, the reason why she is the character who kills the killer, and the fact that she continuously stabs the killer, suggests that she is taking out her sexual frustration on the character. By using a knife or a dagger, the protagonist appears to be getting close to the killer, and intimately has contact with the killer. Also the knife or the dagger is always shown to be long, which can be referred to as a sexual object or a phallic symbol. For example, when Jordana Brewster stabs the killer, she is releasing sexual tension. This is why the director does not portray the “Final Girl” to be sexually active and seductive towards other characters in the film. This links to the film noir genre, where women in movies were killed if they were to be sexually provocative in any sort of way.

Women, are usually seen not to rely upon men in slasher genre films, nor are they seen to be in a sexually active relationship, and that is if they are in a relationship at all. More contemporary slasher films, portray women to be virginal and show them to fight off any temptation of having sex with another character in the film. The slasher genre portray women to be strong against men, and show the other characters including women to be naïve. I have researched films where this repetitions of conventional aspects have arised and this is only one of my main film texts that there is a strong female character in is portrayed vastly in is the film “Texas Chainsaw Massacre”. “Texas Chainsaw Massacre”., is a horror/slasher genre, potentially arthouse movie and depicts an opposed view of the stereotype that women should only be seen as domestic housewives, and are only good in the house. Instead, Jonathan Liebesman conventionally uses a typicality of slasher genre films and portrays the female protagonist in “Texas Chainsaw Massacre”. (Jordana Brewster) to be independent and unreliant on a male character for sexual needs and pleasure. The women often aspire to the female viewers and therefore they play predominant figures in most slasher genre movies. During the cause of the film we view her experiences as a voyeur, and we see the struggles she as a character, whom we as an audience identify with, goes through. We see her determination to save others' lives. By playing such a strong character in the film, the audiences aspire to her as a role model. This is a key typicality in most slasher genre movies as the majority of women are represented to play stronger character roles. However in society itself this hasn’t always been the case.

Word Count: 2,957

[1] Texas chainsaw massacre (2006)
[2] Mulvey, Laura, Visual Pleasure and narrative cinema (1975)
[3] http://www.cinemademerde.com/Essay-Final_Girl.shtml
[4] Mulvey, Laura, Visual Pleasure and narrative cinema (1975)
[5] Gaye Tuchman (1978) ‘Introduction: the symbolic annihilation of women by the mass media’.
[6] Texas chainsaw massacre – The beginning (2006)
[7] Burton, Graeme ‘ Media and popular culture’ (1999) Pg 87
[8] Mulvey, Laura, Visual Pleasure and narrative cinema (1975)
[9] Mulvey, Laura, Visual Pleasure and narrative cinema (1975)
[10] Mulvey, Laura, Visual Pleasure and narrative cinema (1975)
[11] Patrick Phillips, Understanding film texts (1996)
[12] Richard Maltby, Hollywood Cinema (2003)
[13] Steve Neale, Introduction, (1980)
[14] http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2006/oct/13/horror
[15] Sharon Smith Journal : Women and film (1972)
[16] Texas chainsaw massacre- The Beginning (2006)
[17]http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/737/737607p1.html
[18] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_girl
[19] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_girl
[20] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_girl
[21] Clover, Carol J. Men, Women, and Chainsaws. Princeton: Princeton Univ Pr, 1993. (page 34)

Bibliography

Works Cited

Books

Mulvey, L. (1975), Visual pleasure and narrative cinema.
Tuchman, G. (1978), Intro: The symbolic annihilation of women in the mass media.
Phillips, P. (1996), Understanding film texts
Matlby, R. (2003), Hollywood Cinema
Clover, C. J. (1993). Men, Women and Chainsaws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film.
Neale. S, (1980) Introduction
Burton. G, (1999) Media and Popular Culture
Journal. S, (1972) Women and film

Internet
http://www.cinemademerde.com/Essay-Final_Girl.shtml
(This website gives information on the final girl theory and also talks about some classic Slasher films from the past)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2006/oct/13/horror
(A Guardian newspaper review of Texas Chainsaw Massacre – The Beginning 2006)
http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/737/737607p1.html
(A IGN review of Texas Chainsaw Massacre – The Beginning 2006 by Todd Gilchrist)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_girl
(This website also gives information on the theory of final girl)

Moving Image Texts
Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974), Tobe Hooper
Psycho (1960), Alfred Hitchcock
Creep (2004), Christopher Smith
Halloween (1978), John Carpenter
Scream (1997), Wes Craven



Works Consulted

Books
Wood (1979): introduction
Brian Murphy (1995): Monster Movies
Steve Neale (2002), Genre and Contemporary Hollywood

Internet
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slasher_film
(This website talks about the history of the Slasher genre and how the first inspiration was taken from the film Psycho in 1960)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Texas_Chain_Saw_Massacre
(This website shows the film TCM in detail as it talks about the story and its significance)
Moving Image Text
The Wrong Turn, (2003) Rob Schmidt
The Hills Have Eyes, (2006) Alexandre Aja